Orbakajte Appeal against the order of the Court of Grozny

Christina Orbakaite lawyers received on Monday the decision of the court of Grozny, the fate of her son, Denis, which they can not share with his former civilian husband Ruslan Baisarov, and will soon submit an appeal to the Supreme Court of the Chechen Republic. This is the representative Orbakaite and power of attorney expressly traveled to Chechnya - "it and turned on the light in the study, and were not allowed, and the judge it was not, but to get the decision of Christina made it." In the case of a residence on 15 Denis Baisarov September, but according to the spokesman, the sentence was 23 Listed September. This gives lawyers Orbakajte opportunity to appeal this decision to the Supreme Court of Chechnya within 10 days, that is until 3 October. If the High Court dismissed the complaint, fell Tver Court of Moscow, where the claim as Baisarov Orbakajte is to determine the place of residence of the child, the case. Orbakajte "They (Grozny court) did not play for the time they send us to the decision, because it can appeal within 10 days after the decision, or it enters into force. But thank God we had time. Soon will appeal to be submitted to the Supreme Court of Chechnya "- the spokesman added. In turn, the lawyer Tatyana Orbakajte Akimtseva RIA Novosti that the court she received "wrong form, but only by fax - come Orbakaite representative and power of attorney to Chechnya, photographed the event and sent it by e-mail." "It turned out that the case is fragmented, not sewn, numbered sheets are not things out there, so that the decision is no reference to the case sheet. The result was that a number of documents, we distort the shape - for example, on the first page of the application Kasirat Baisarov date is printed his signature, and the second day of the hand and the other signature. This indicates that the document is forged. It's clear that if the document is forged, the court made an illegal decision, "- says Akimtseva They also said that 90% of the decision on the testimony of a witness is based -. Hopes Babysitting Levchuk, but after Akimtseva, it was not because - it has provided written testimony, not notarized Such examples lawyer already counted on eight leaves "We did not get to the reasons for the decision and the court records, bound, signed, stamped and signed by the judge... A series of documents, we have not, and those who do not get numbered. This makes it possible to continue to forge shops, "- says the lawyer." But we are on time, so that in this fax basis can not we prepare a cassation to the full ", worried - concluded the lawyer, adding that all of the above violations provide the basis for a further appeal to the Supreme Court the Chechen Republic.